TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS TERHADAP BELAJAR IPA DI KELAS V SD
Keywords:
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD). Hasil Belajar, IPAAbstract
Background of the problem in this research is during the learning process, the learning process is still teacher centered (teacher centered learning), so that the students have not been involved and lees focus. The division of the group that carried out theteacher’s not in a heterogeneous, so that the impact on students. Students are less motivated for the award of the teacher. This study aims to determine the effect of cooperative learning model type student teams achievement division (STAD) towards science learning outcomes of students of class V elementary school 33 Kalumbuk PadangThis research type that is research quantitative, with desain research is quasi-experimental design. Design with Nonequivalent Control Group Design, in this design there are two classes, then used as the experimental class and the control class. The results of this study, shows that 2.594 greater than = 1.691. Based on the results, this study has proven that the use of cooperative learning model type student teams achievement division (STAD) influences significantly on student’s learning outcomes in natural science learning materials on digestive organs in the class V SD Negeri 33 Kalumbuk Padang academic year 2017/2018.
References
BumiAksara.
\
[2[Asma, Nur. 2008. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Padang:UNP Press.
\
[3]Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.2006.Kurikulum Tingkat SatuanPendidikan. Jakarta.
\
[4]Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan.Jakarta: Depdiknas.
\
[5]Hamalik, Oemar. 2008. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT BumiAksara.
\
[6]Isjoni. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Alfabeta.
\
[7]Istarani. 2014. 58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif.Medan: Media Persada.
\
[8]Jihad, Asep dan Abdul Haris. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Multi Pressindo.
\
[9]Maslichah, Asy’ari. 2006. Penerapan Pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta : Universitas Sanata Dharma.
\
[10]Priyatno, Duwi. 2009. SPSS “Untuk Analisis Korelasi, Regresi dan Multivariate” Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
\
[11]Priyatno, Duwi. 2010. Paham Analisa Statistik Data denganSPSS.Yogyakarta: Mediakom
\
[12]Purwanto. 2009. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
\
[13]Rifa’i, Achmad dan Catharina Tri Anni.2011.Psikologi Pendidikan.Semarang: Unnes Press.
\
[14]Rusman. 2012. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembang Profesional Guru. Jakarta:Raja Wali Pers.
\
[15]Rusmono.2012.Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning itu Perlu.
Jakarta: Ghaila Indonesia.
\
[16]Sagala, Syaiful. 2013. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
\
[17]Samatowa, Usman. 2011. Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
\
[18]Sanjaya, Wina. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
\
[19]Slavin, E Robert. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Nusa Media.
\
[20]Sudjana, Nana.2015. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
\
[21]Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung:
Alfabeta.
\
[22]-------. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
\
[23]Trianto.2010 .Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovasif-Progresif. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
\
[24]Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2009. Jakarta : Diperbanyak oleh CV Novindo Pustaka Mandiri.
\
[25]Wisudawati, Asih Widi dan Eka Sulistyowati. 2014. Metodolodi Pembelajaran IPA. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
